TY - JOUR
T1 - Behavior of surface loaded clay foundation reinforced by GESCs with lateral geosynthetic cushion under freeze-thaw cycles
AU - Gu, Zi Ang
AU - Chen, Jian Feng
AU - Yoo, Chungsik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - The efficiency of geosynthetics has been proven in stone column-reinforced foundations. In this paper, loading tests were conducted on three stone column-reinforced foundations, experiencing four freeze-thaw cycles. The effects of geosynthetic encasement and lateral reinforcement were investigated on the behavior of ordinary stone column (OSC) – reinforced and geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) – reinforced foundation. The results showed that particles of OSCs spread into foundation soil during freezing and thawing, and top of OSCs were replaced by foundation soil. The temperature gradient along the depth in OSC-reinforced foundation was smaller than in GESC-reinforced foundations, resulting in a lower negative pore pressure at the beginning of freezing. However, it was found that geosynthetic encasement helped maintain the integrity of GESCs, and increased the stress concentration ratio (SCR) during thawing, which led to a lower excess pore pressure in GESC-reinforced foundations. The lateral reinforcement was also found to not only reduce the differential settlement between GESCs and soil during thawing, but also restrain the frost heave during freezing. The tensile membrane effect of lateral reinforcement redistributed the stress and the overburden pressure throughout the freeze-thaw process. More water moved upwards during freezing in the OSC-reinforced foundation, leading to a larger amount of frost heave. However, the moisture migration became complex in the OSC-reinforced foundation, as OSCs were damaged by freeze-thaw cycles.
AB - The efficiency of geosynthetics has been proven in stone column-reinforced foundations. In this paper, loading tests were conducted on three stone column-reinforced foundations, experiencing four freeze-thaw cycles. The effects of geosynthetic encasement and lateral reinforcement were investigated on the behavior of ordinary stone column (OSC) – reinforced and geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) – reinforced foundation. The results showed that particles of OSCs spread into foundation soil during freezing and thawing, and top of OSCs were replaced by foundation soil. The temperature gradient along the depth in OSC-reinforced foundation was smaller than in GESC-reinforced foundations, resulting in a lower negative pore pressure at the beginning of freezing. However, it was found that geosynthetic encasement helped maintain the integrity of GESCs, and increased the stress concentration ratio (SCR) during thawing, which led to a lower excess pore pressure in GESC-reinforced foundations. The lateral reinforcement was also found to not only reduce the differential settlement between GESCs and soil during thawing, but also restrain the frost heave during freezing. The tensile membrane effect of lateral reinforcement redistributed the stress and the overburden pressure throughout the freeze-thaw process. More water moved upwards during freezing in the OSC-reinforced foundation, leading to a larger amount of frost heave. However, the moisture migration became complex in the OSC-reinforced foundation, as OSCs were damaged by freeze-thaw cycles.
KW - Freeze-thaw cycles
KW - Geosynthetic encasement
KW - Lateral reinforcement
KW - Moisture migration
KW - Stone column-reinforced foundation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85195051930
U2 - 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.05.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85195051930
SN - 0266-1144
VL - 52
SP - 941
EP - 955
JO - Geotextiles and Geomembranes
JF - Geotextiles and Geomembranes
IS - 5
ER -