Basic cardiac life support education for non-medical hospital employees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommends that strategies should be implemented that promote cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in the workplace. Non-medical employees at a hospital were therefore trained to conduct basic life support (BLS). Subject background information, test results and survey findings were examined and factors affecting BLS skill acquisition were studied. Methods: Of 1432 non-medical employees at a hospital trained to conduct BLS, 880 agreed to participate in the survey. The training course consisted of a single session of 3 h of lectures, practice and testing. Skill acquisition was assessed using a 13-item skill checklist and a 5-point overall competency scale. The effects of age, gender, type of job, educational status, a previous history of CPR training and level of subject-perceived training difficulty were examined. Results: According to total checklist scores, subjects achieved a mean (SD) score of 8.66 (3.57). 22.3% performed all 13 skills. Based on 5-point overall competency ratings, 43.7% of subjects were rated as "competent", ''very good'' or "outstanding". Age (<40 years and >40 years) was the only factor that significantly affected skill acquisition (skill acquisition by those >40 years of age was poorer than by those aged <40 years). Conclusion: Traditional BLS training is less effective in individuals aged >40 years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-330
Number of pages4
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Basic cardiac life support education for non-medical hospital employees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this