Atypical RAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer

Filippo Pietrantonio, Rona Yaeger, Alexa B. Schrock, Giovanni Randon, Sandra Romero-Cordoba, Daniele Rossini, Giovanni Fucà, Jeffrey S. Ross, Daisuke Kotani, Russell Madison, Seung Tae Kim, Lisa Salvatore, Alessandra Raimondi, Filippo Pagani, Beatrice Borelli, Federica Perrone, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Vincent A. Miller, Siraj M. Ali, Jeeyun LeeTakayuki Yoshino, Filippo De Braud, Alfredo Falcone, Jaclyn F. Hechtman, Chiara Cremolini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE To describe the clinical and molecular features of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) bearing uncommon atypical RAS (At-RAS) mutations at codons other than 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, and 146. MATERIALS AND METHODS By exploiting five next-generation sequencing sources (Italian collaboration, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, the Biomarker Research for Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer Genomics (BREAC) study, and the Foundation Medicine database), we retrieved 175 At-RAS mutated cases. Molecular data were obtained from 163 samples from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the Foundation Medicine database. Clinical data were available for 27 At-RAS-positive and 467 negative cases from the Italian collaboration, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, and the BREAC study. RESULTS At-RAS mutations were identified in 163 (0.9%) of 18,270 mCRCs. Among 133 with evaluable microsatellite instability status, 11 (8%) were microsatellite instability high. POLE exonuclease domain mutations had higher frequency (7%) than expected and were found only in microsatellite-stable tumors with high tumor mutational burden (TMB). Overall, 17% (28 of 163) of At-RAS cases had TMB greater than 20 mutations/Mb. Co-occurring typical RAS/BRAF V600E mutations and NF1 mutations, presumed to cause RAS activation, were found in 30% and 12% of samples, respectively (up to 43% and 50%, respectively, in TMB-high samples). Patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC achieved a median overall survival (OS) of 42.1 months, whereas those harboring isolated At-RAS, typical RAS, or BRAF V600E mutations showed a median OS of 32.3, 30.0, and 17.9 months, respectively (P , .001). No significant OS difference (P = .240) was found between patients with At- RAS versus typical RAS-mutated mCRC. Only one of six patients evaluable for primary resistance to anti- epidermal growth factor receptors achieved tumor response. CONCLUSION At-RAS mutations may be a marker for RAS pathway activation and can be associated with high cooccurrence of POLE exonuclease domain mutations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJCO Precision Oncology
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atypical RAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this