Atezolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases: Exploratory analyses of the phase III OAK study

  • Shirish M. Gadgeel
  • , Rimas V. Lukas
  • , Jerome Goldschmidt
  • , Paul Conkling
  • , Keunchil Park
  • , Diego Cortinovis
  • , Filippo de Marinis
  • , Achim Rittmeyer
  • , Jyoti D. Patel
  • , Joachim von Pawel
  • , Carol O'Hear
  • , Catherine Lai
  • , Sylvia Hu
  • , Marcus Ballinger
  • , Alan Sandler
  • , Mayank Gandhi
  • , Lou Fehrenbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

169 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab and docetaxel in patients with and without a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases in the phase III OAK trial. Materials and methods: Patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or loss of clinical atezolizumab benefit. Patients with asymptomatic, treated supratentorial metastases were eligible. Patients had brain scans before enrollment; follow-up brain scans and treatment were required when clinically indicated. Results: Approximately 14% of patients in each arm had a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases (61/425 in the atezolizumab arm and 62/425 in the docetaxel arm). Fewer treatment-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and treatment-related neurologic AEs were reported with atezolizumab than with docetaxel, regardless of history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases. In patients with a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases, median overall survival (OS) was longer with atezolizumab than with docetaxel (16.0 vs 11.9 months; hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49–1.13). Median OS was also longer with atezolizumab in patients without a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases (13.2 vs 9.3 months; hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.63–0.88). Landmark analyses showed that patients with a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases had a lower probability of developing new symptomatic brain lesions with atezolizumab vs docetaxel at 6–24 months. Patients without a history had a lower probability with atezolizumab at 18–24+ months. Conclusion: Atezolizumab had an acceptable neurologic safety profile, showed a trend toward an OS benefit, and led to a prolonged time to radiographic identification of new symptomatic brain lesions compared with docetaxel in patients who had a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02008227.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-112
Number of pages8
JournalLung Cancer
Volume128
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Atezolizumab
  • Brain
  • Central nervous system
  • Metastasis
  • Non-small cell lung cancer (5/6)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atezolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases: Exploratory analyses of the phase III OAK study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this