Association of Prophylactic Distal Perfusion Cannulation With Mortality in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

  • Hyeok Hee Lee
  • , Woo Jin Jang
  • , Chul Min Ahn
  • , Woo Jung Chun
  • , Ju Hyeon Oh
  • , Yong Hwan Park
  • , Seung Jun Lee
  • , Sung Jin Hong
  • , Jeong Hoon Yang
  • , Jung Sun Kim
  • , Hyeon Chang Kim
  • , Byeong Keuk Kim
  • , Cheol Woong Yu
  • , Hyun Joong Kim
  • , Jang Whan Bae
  • , Young Guk Ko
  • , Donghoon Choi
  • , Hyeon Cheol Gwon
  • , Myeong Ki Hong
  • , Yangsoo Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prophylactic distal perfusion cannulation (PDPC) is protectively associated with limb ischemia in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). However, evidence supporting its benefits beyond limb ischemia reduction is scarce. We aimed to investigate whether PDPC, compared with no-PDPC, is associated with a lower risk of mortality in patients receiving VA-ECMO. From a multicenter registry, we identified 479 patients who underwent VA-ECMO support for refractory CS. The association of PDPC with 30-day mortality was assessed using multiple methods, including instrumental variable analysis, overlap weighting, and propensity score matching. Of the 479 patients, 154 (32.2%) received PDPC. The 30-day mortality rate was 33.1% in the PDPC group and 53.2% in the no-PDPC group. The instrumental variable analysis showed a protective association of PDPC with 30-day mortality (absolute risk difference −16.7%, 95% confidence interval −31.3% to −2.1%; relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.96). The findings were consistent in the overlap-weighted analysis (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.98) and in the propensity score–matched analysis (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.00). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes, including stroke, ECMO site bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and sepsis, between PDPC and no-PDPC. In conclusion, PDPC was associated with a lower risk of mortality at 30 days in patients with CS receiving VA-ECMO. The efficacy and safety of PDPC merit evaluation in future randomized studies. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02985008.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-425
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume207
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Nov 2023

Keywords

  • distal perfusion
  • extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • mortality
  • prophylaxis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of Prophylactic Distal Perfusion Cannulation With Mortality in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this