Assessing Operational and Collaborative Performance Management: A Case Study of PhillyStat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many cities and agencies in the U.S. have adopted the "-Stat" approach, which is called "PerformanceStat" in general. Philadelphia has created PhillyStat as its performance management and tracking tool, of which unique feature is its twofold review process involving both operational and outcome level. This study assesses the capacities of PhillyStat. The assessment suggests four implications for jurisdictional governments and agencies employing the "-Stat" approach. First, the "-Stat" approach should evolve toward strategic review beyond day-to-day operational review. Second, the "-Stat" approach should close the gap in diverse views on government performance. Third, the "-Stat" approach should be used as an effective tool for public management and leadership. Last, the "-Stat" approach should develop capabilities for cross-organizational collaboration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)514-527
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • case study
  • CitiStat
  • performance management
  • performance review
  • PerformanceStat

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Operational and Collaborative Performance Management: A Case Study of PhillyStat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this