Are suspicious activity reporting requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges effective?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of a newly emerging type of anti-money laundering regulation that obligates cryptocurrency exchanges to report suspicious transactions to financial authorities. We build a theoretical model for the reporting decision structure of a private bank or cryptocurrency exchange and show that an inferior ability to detect money laundering (ML) increases the ratio of reported transactions to unreported transactions. If a representative money launderer makes an optimal portfolio choice, then this ratio increases further. Our findings suggest that cryptocurrency exchanges will exhibit more excessive reporting behavior under this regulation than private banks. We attribute this result to cryptocurrency exchanges’ inferior ML detection abilities and their proximity to the underground economy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number78
JournalFinancial Innovation
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Cryptocurrency
  • Cryptocurrency exchange
  • Financial regulation
  • Money laundering
  • Portfolio choice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are suspicious activity reporting requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges effective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this