Anti-Tumor Effects of Wee1 Kinase Inhibitor with Radiotherapy in Human Cervical Cancer

Yoo Young Lee, Young Jae Cho, Sung won Shin, Changhoon Choi, Ji Yoon Ryu, Hye Kyung Jeon, Jung Joo Choi, Jae Ryoung Hwang, Chel Hun Choi, Tae Joong Kim, Byoung Gie Kim, Duk Soo Bae, Won Park, Jeong Won Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although the concurrent use of a chemotherapeutic agent and radiotherapy improves survival in patients with locally advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, severe side effects related to chemotherapy are frequent and may result in a low quality of life for the patients. In this study, we investigated the effects of a combination of Wee1 inhibitor (AZD1775) and irradiation in cervical cancer. In vitro effects of AZD1775 with irradiation in human cervical cancer cells were assessed by clonogenic survival and apoptosis assays. The effects on DNA damage response signaling and the cell cycle were also explored. Tumor growth delay was evaluated to investigate the in vivo effects of AZD1775 with irradiation in cervical cancer mouse models, including xenografts and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). The co-treatment of AZD1775 and irradiation significantly decreased clonogenic survival and increased apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. These effects were associated with G2 checkpoint abrogation which resulted in persistent DNA damage. Both in the xenografts and the PDXs, the co-treatment significantly decreased tumor growth compared tothe irradiation alone (p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that the Wee1 inhibitor (AZD1775) can be considered as a potential alternative as a radiosensitizer in cervical cancer instead of a chemotherapeutic agent such as cisplatin.

Original languageEnglish
Article number15394
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-Tumor Effects of Wee1 Kinase Inhibitor with Radiotherapy in Human Cervical Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this