Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anti-Corruption Policy and Whistle-Blowing Intentions: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Meritocratic Civil Service Systems

  • Don S. Lee
  • , Annemarie S. Walter
  • , Soonae Park
  • University of Nottingham
  • Seoul National University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

How does an anti-corruption policy shape bureaucrats’ intentions to whistle-blow? Anti-corruption research suggests that civil servants with certain characteristics are more or less likely to blow the whistle, due to a discrepancy in perceptions of expected outcomes within the organizational hierarchy. We test this logic by examining how civil servants’ gender, age, and civil service rank shape changes in their whistle-blowing intentions, leveraging the recent implementation of an anti-corruption policy in South Korea. By analyzing original survey data on over 5,000 civil servants, matching pre- and post-implementation groups, we find that male, older, and high-ranking civil servants, respectively, are more willing to whistle-blow than female, younger, and low-ranking civil servants when the anti-corruption policy is implemented. The implication of this finding is that the greater power and prestige granted to the former groups within the organizational hierarchy may make them more willing to do so.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1194-1217
Number of pages24
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • anti-corruption policy
  • meritocratic civil service
  • quasi-experiment
  • whistle-blowing intentions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-Corruption Policy and Whistle-Blowing Intentions: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Meritocratic Civil Service Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this