Analysis of rectal dynamic and static compliances in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: Our aim was to investigate whether the dynamic and static compliances differ between patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and normal subjects. Materials and methods: Fifty-five IBS patients (age range 20-65 years, mean age 39.0 years, 28 women and 27 men; 36 diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) patients and 19 constipation-predominant IBS (IBS-C) patients) with symptoms that fulfilled the Rome-II criteria and 21 healthy controls (age range 25-58 years, mean age 37.8 years; 11 women and ten men) were recruited. The anorectal functions, including dynamic compliance, were evaluated via barostat tests. A power exponential model was used for the evaluation of static compliance. Results: There was nosignificant difference in dynamic compliance between the normal subjects and the IBS patients (10.3±3.1 and 8.9±2.9 mmHg, respectively, P>0.05). However, even though no significant difference was detected in the overall shape of the curve (β P>0.05), there were significant differences in the κ and Phalf between the normal subjects and the IBS patients (P<0.05), respectively. When we compared the dynamic and static compliances between the IBS-C and IBS-D patients, there were no significant differences found (P>0.05). Conclusions: An exponential model provided good fit to the actual data, and there were significant differences in static compliance between the normal subjects and the IBS patients. This result can reveal the altered biomechanical properties of the gut wall in IBS patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)659-664
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Dynamic compliance
  • Irritable bowel syndrome
  • Static compliance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of rectal dynamic and static compliances in patients with irritable bowel syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this