An investigation of detection biases in the unattended periphery during simulated driving

Musen Kingsley Li, Hakwan Lau, Brian Odegaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

While people often think they veridically perceive much of the visual surround, recent findings indicate that when asked to detect targets such as gratings embedded in visual noise, observers make more false alarms in the unattended periphery. Do these results from psychophysics studies generalize to more ecologically valid settings? We used a modern game engine to create a simulated driving environment where participants (as drivers) had to make judgments about the colors of pedestrians’ clothing in the periphery. Confirming our hypothesis based on previous psychophysics studies, we found that subjects showed liberal biases for unattended locations when detecting specific colors of pedestrians’ clothing. A second experiment showed that this finding was not simply due to a confirmation bias in decision-making when subjects were uncertain. Together, these results support the idea that in everyday visual experience, there is subjective inflation of experienced detail in the periphery, which may happen at the decisional level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1325-1332
Number of pages8
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume80
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Signal detection theory
  • Visual perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An investigation of detection biases in the unattended periphery during simulated driving'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this