Allelic divergence in the human insulin gene provides evidence for intragenic recombination events in the non-coding regions: evidence for existence of new alleles

Yong Sung Kim, Myoung Hee Kim, Young Kil Choi, Cheorl Ho Kim, Dae Sil Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intragenic polymorphism of the human insulin gene (INS) was investigated in Korean subjects. The 1.9 kb INS sequence, including the 5′ to 3′ flanking regions, was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and analyzed by direct sequencing. All nucleotide sequences in the coding regions were the same as INS sequences previously reported, and four nucleotides, at positions +216, +1045, +1367, and +1380 in the non-coding regions, were found to be polymorphic. In addition to the previously identified polymorphic alleles αl (A-C-C-C) and β1 (T-G-T-A), new nucleotide arrangements were also identified and designated α4 (A-C-C-A), α5 (A-G-C-C), α6 (A-C-T-C), and β2 (T-C-C-C). It was concluded that the new alleles may originate by intragenic recombination within INS during chromosomal crossing-over between the α1 and β1 alleles. The allele α1 was the predominant form in our sample; the new variant alleles, as well as allele β1, appeared to be much less frequent in INSs genes of the Korean subjects studied. Furthermore, the new alleles were detected only in heterozygous form. These results suggest that intragenic recombination can account for allelic divergence in INS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-151
Number of pages6
JournalMGG Molecular & General Genetics
Volume245
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1994
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Allelic divergence
  • Human insulin gene
  • Intragenic recombination
  • Non-coding regions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Allelic divergence in the human insulin gene provides evidence for intragenic recombination events in the non-coding regions: evidence for existence of new alleles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this