TY - JOUR
T1 - Advanced Design and Comparative Analysis of Methanol Production Routes from CO2 and Renewable H2
T2 - via Syngas vs. Direct Hydrogenation Processes
AU - Cho, Seolhee
AU - Do, Thai Ngan
AU - Kim, Jiyong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Seolhee Cho et al.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In this study, we propose two advanced processes, i.e., advanced syngas-to-methanol (AS2M) and direct CO2-to-methanol (DC2M) processes, for methanol production using waste CO2 and renewable H2 as feedstock. The AS2M process produces methanol from syngas after converting CO2 to CO via reverse water-gas shift and separating CO from a mixture through pressure swing adsorption. In comparison, the DC2M process directly synthesizes methanol from CO2 through direct hydrogenation. Different unit processes and recycles were synthesized to determine the optimal process configurations and operating conditions for maximizing the methanol production rate. The technoeconomic and environmental capabilities of the two proposed processes were analyzed with four evaluation criteria (carbon and energy efficiencies, CO2 reduction, and unit production cost) and compared with conventional CO2-to-methanol processes. A sensitivity analysis for various utilities and H2 supply strategies was performed to evaluate the economic feasibility and environmental benefits of the proposed systems with different design options. Our findings showed that both processes could achieve improved technical, economic, and environmental performances compared to conventional processes. In particular, the DC2M process showed the lowest unit production cost at $1.02/kg because of its simple configuration and mild operating conditions.
AB - In this study, we propose two advanced processes, i.e., advanced syngas-to-methanol (AS2M) and direct CO2-to-methanol (DC2M) processes, for methanol production using waste CO2 and renewable H2 as feedstock. The AS2M process produces methanol from syngas after converting CO2 to CO via reverse water-gas shift and separating CO from a mixture through pressure swing adsorption. In comparison, the DC2M process directly synthesizes methanol from CO2 through direct hydrogenation. Different unit processes and recycles were synthesized to determine the optimal process configurations and operating conditions for maximizing the methanol production rate. The technoeconomic and environmental capabilities of the two proposed processes were analyzed with four evaluation criteria (carbon and energy efficiencies, CO2 reduction, and unit production cost) and compared with conventional CO2-to-methanol processes. A sensitivity analysis for various utilities and H2 supply strategies was performed to evaluate the economic feasibility and environmental benefits of the proposed systems with different design options. Our findings showed that both processes could achieve improved technical, economic, and environmental performances compared to conventional processes. In particular, the DC2M process showed the lowest unit production cost at $1.02/kg because of its simple configuration and mild operating conditions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85173604210
U2 - 10.1155/2023/6270858
DO - 10.1155/2023/6270858
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173604210
SN - 0363-907X
VL - 2023
JO - International Journal of Energy Research
JF - International Journal of Energy Research
M1 - 6270858
ER -