Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

  • Dean F. Bajorin
  • , J. Alfred Witjes
  • , Jürgen E. Gschwend
  • , Michael Schenker
  • , Begoña P. Valderrama
  • , Yoshihiko Tomita
  • , Aristotelis Bamias
  • , Thierry Lebret
  • , Shahrokh F. Shariat
  • , Se Hoon Park
  • , Dingwei Ye
  • , Mads Agerbaek
  • , Deborah Enting
  • , Ray McDermott
  • , Pablo Gajate
  • , Avivit Peer
  • , Matthew I. Milowsky
  • , Alexander Nosov
  • , João Neif Antonio
  • , Krzysztof Tupikowski
  • Laurence Toms, Bruce S. Fischer, Anila Qureshi, Sandra Collette, Keziban Unsal-Kacmaz, Edward Broughton, Dimitrios Zardavas, Henry B. Koon, Matthew D. Galsky
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Technical University of Munich
  • SF Nectarie Oncology Center
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Niigata University
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Cornell University
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • University of Texas at Dallas
  • Charles University
  • Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
  • Fudan University
  • Aarhus University
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • University College Dublin
  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
  • Rambam Health Care Campus Israel
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Russian Ministry of Health
  • Hospital de Amor de Barretos
  • Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2102-2114
Number of pages13
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume384
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jun 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this