A phase II trial of gefitinib monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer not harboring activating EGFR mutations: Implications of sensitive EGFR mutation test

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Efficacy of gefitinib therapy strongly depends on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, cumulative data from many clinical studies demonstrated that some patients with wild-type (WT) EGFR also responded to gefitinib with durable disease control rate (DCR). The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gefitinib in NSCLC patients with WT EGFR who failed previous chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC whose tumors have WT EGFR were eligible. Gefitinib (250 mg/day) was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary end point was DCR at 8 weeks. Results: A total of 85 patients (53 men and 32 women; median age, 60 years; range 30-86) were enrolled between October 2010 and May 2013. Seventy-four patients (87.1 %) had adenocarcinoma. Forty-two patients (49.4 %) were treated with gefitinib as second-line chemotherapy. Eleven patients showed partial response, and 21 had stable disease. Thus, objective response rate was 12.9 %, and DCR at 8 weeks was 37.6 %. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 1.9 and 10.9 months, respectively. Skin rash was the most common side effect. It is of note that patients with skin rash of any grade had improved PFS with gefitinib as compared with patients experiencing no skin rash (median PFS: 3.0 vs. 1.7 months, P = 0.004). One patient developed interstitial lung disease (grade 2). Of 11 gefitinib responders, 6 patients were identified as having tumor with activating EGFR mutation by peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping method. Regarding the outcomes of the 79 patients, excluding 6 positive mutations, the response rate was 6.3 %, and DCR at 8 weeks was 31.8 %. Conclusion: Small proportion of NSCLC patients with the WT EGFR benefits with gefitinib. Optimized diagnosis through more sensitive bioassay could have major consequences in terms of the selection of candidate for EGFR TKI in patients with WT EGFR by direct sequencing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1229-1236
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Volume75
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Jun 2015

Keywords

  • EGFR mutation
  • Gefitinib
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Sensitive method
  • Wild type

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A phase II trial of gefitinib monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer not harboring activating EGFR mutations: Implications of sensitive EGFR mutation test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this