TY - GEN
T1 - A Multimode 157W 4-Channel 80dBA-SNDR Speech-Recognition Frontend With Self-DOA Correction Adaptive Beamformer
AU - Kang, Taewook
AU - Lee, Seungjong
AU - Song, Seungheun
AU - Haghighat, Mohammad R.
AU - Flynn, Michael P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Beamforming with multiple microphones is essential for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) in earbuds, cell phones, and smart speakers. Although fixed delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming is simple to implement, it only suppresses noise from a fixed direction of arrival (DoA) [1]; hence, it is ineffective in real varying noise conditions. Reference [2] implements ultra-low-power keyword spotting (KWS) with noise suppression, but the lack of an ADC and beamforming limit practical application. On the other hand, adaptive beamforming (ABF) actively adjusts nulls to suppress varying noise sources. Adaptive beamforming with a trained DNN is promising [3] but requires extensive training data and high power consumption and is not applicable for battery-operated systems. Conventional adaptive beamforming [4 - 5] (Fig. 32.5.1) adaptively reduces noise and interference in the output of a fixed DAS beamformer. Although conventional ABF is effective and compact, it is hampered by: 1) high DSP power consumption due to high ADC sampling rate and the need for complex calculations, especially in the blocking matrix (BM); 2) target signal direction errors in DAS cause severe signal distortion; and 3) worst-case input-SNR design causes high ADC and DSP power regardless of actual signal conditions.
AB - Beamforming with multiple microphones is essential for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) in earbuds, cell phones, and smart speakers. Although fixed delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming is simple to implement, it only suppresses noise from a fixed direction of arrival (DoA) [1]; hence, it is ineffective in real varying noise conditions. Reference [2] implements ultra-low-power keyword spotting (KWS) with noise suppression, but the lack of an ADC and beamforming limit practical application. On the other hand, adaptive beamforming (ABF) actively adjusts nulls to suppress varying noise sources. Adaptive beamforming with a trained DNN is promising [3] but requires extensive training data and high power consumption and is not applicable for battery-operated systems. Conventional adaptive beamforming [4 - 5] (Fig. 32.5.1) adaptively reduces noise and interference in the output of a fixed DAS beamformer. Although conventional ABF is effective and compact, it is hampered by: 1) high DSP power consumption due to high ADC sampling rate and the need for complex calculations, especially in the blocking matrix (BM); 2) target signal direction errors in DAS cause severe signal distortion; and 3) worst-case input-SNR design causes high ADC and DSP power regardless of actual signal conditions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85128261815
U2 - 10.1109/ISSCC42614.2022.9731571
DO - 10.1109/ISSCC42614.2022.9731571
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85128261815
T3 - Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference
SP - 500
EP - 502
BT - 2022 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2022 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2022
Y2 - 20 February 2022 through 26 February 2022
ER -