Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Delphi consensus on clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of major depressive disorder patients with anhedonia amongst psychiatrists in the Asia-Pacific

  • Calvin Cheng
  • , Keira Herr
  • , Hong Jin Jeon
  • , Tadafumi Kato
  • , Chee H. Ng
  • , Yen Kuang Yang
  • , Ling Zhang
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Janssen Medical Affairs Asia Pacific
  • Juntendo University
  • University of Melbourne
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Capital Medical University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Anhedonia, a core diagnostic feature for major depressive disorder (MDD), is defined as the loss of pleasure and interest in daily activities. Its prevalence in MDD patients vary from 35 to 70%. Anhedonia in MDD negatively impacts functioning and is associated with treatment resistance and poorer prognosis for various clinical outcomes. Owing to its complexity, there remains considerable heterogeneity in the conceptualization, diagnosis and clinical management of anhedonia in MDD. Methods: This modified Delphi panel was conducted to elicit expert opinion and establish consensus on concepts relating to clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of MDD with anhedonia (MDDwA) amongst psychiatrists in the Asia-Pacific region. Seven themes were covered. A three-stage process was adopted for consensus generation (two online survey rounds, followed by a moderated consensus meeting). Statements were developed based on a literature review and input from a steering committee of six regional experts. The panel included 12 psychiatrists practicing in Australia, China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan with ≥5 years of specialist clinical experience, including assessment or management of patients with MDDwA. Results: Overall, consensus was achieved (median ≥8) on 89/103 statements (86%). About half of the statements (55/103, 53%) achieved consensus in Round 1, and 29/36 modified statements achieved consensus in Round 2. At the moderated consensus meeting, five modified statements were discussed by the steering committee and consensus was achieved on all statements (5/5). The findings highlighted a lack of clear and practical methods in clinical practice for assessing anhedonia in MDD patients and limited physician awareness of anhedonia in Asia-Pacific. Conclusion: Insights from this Delphi consensus provide a reference point for psychiatrists in Asia-Pacific to optimize their strategies for personalized diagnosis and management of patients with MDDwA. Identification of distinct and clinically relevant subtypes in MDD may be valuable for guiding personalized diagnosis and management approaches, including type-specific therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1338063
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Asia Pacific
  • DSM-5
  • Delphi consensus
  • anhedonia
  • major depressive disorder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Delphi consensus on clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of major depressive disorder patients with anhedonia amongst psychiatrists in the Asia-Pacific'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this